Bikini Season

You would be wrong to think that bikini season is around the corner. It has been here for centuries.
This scene from a 4th Century AD mosaic, found in the Villa Romana del Casale, shows women in bandeau tops and bikini bottoms enjoying the fun of warm weather activities. They toss a ball, run and one seems to be accepting a crown which, though tempting to suggest it is for a beauty contest, is likely for her success at some athletic endeavor.

These lovely ladies have bellies but delight in their motion in the sun. So if you are having any doubts about your potential this summer, I recommend ignoring the whispers of indecency remnant from the release of the bikini back in 1946 and embracing the casual ease of these women instead, who let the sun shine on their life.

Baldessari, Adventures and Evasions

Baldessari, whose retrospective just left the Met in January, was recently in conversation with Fred Tutten, an author and professor on the relationship between art and literature. Poor Tutten tried valiantly to have Baldessari say something meaningful on his preferred readings, or offer suggestions to young artists but Baldessari slyly avoided it with amusing anecdotes and a modesty that belied his wicked sense of humor.

He shared a parable from one of his books of the young artist who has finished school. He asks his teachers for advice on how to succeed and they encourage him to visit gallerists and show his work. He arrives in New York and displays his slides to everyone who will sit still long enough to look at them. Repeatedly he is told, you are too provincial, we are looking for art history, for meaning, for statements about the world today. Going to museums in his spare time, he paints, and copies, and draws, and thinks about art and only art until the poor young man collapses. After a long sleep, he valiantly tries again and takes around his slides once more. This time the gallerists seeing a half-starved, penniless man whose age was hidden by the pallor of his skin said, ah! you are historical. Moral of the story: historical mispronounced sounds like hysterical.

But he did say that he learned something in that period. He discovered that he was in fact a closet minimalist. The important thing was to keep the work as lean as possible, trim off the fat, leave only the meat. The trick is, of course, in learning how not to take a slice too much which then kills the work.

He is a film noir addict and may have gotten more excited talking about film than anything else over the course of the evening talk. In preparation for a graduation talk he must give soon, he considered simply reading a list of film noir titles and saying: this is me. Among his favorite film noir character names is Rick. Some days he would tell himself: Be like George Raft. Robert Mitchum would work too. He thought anyone could learn a lot by watching how Goddard in particular edited his films, bemoaning sound and color for having destroyed film. Look at Fritz Lang in Germany and then Hollywood! When films added sound and color they became about storylines rather than visual effects, and the writer became more important to the loss of the original wonder of the medium.

It had never occurred to him to be an artist. Growing up in what was nicely called a service community south of San Diego, his mother an upper class Danish woman who had books shipped to her and a father who had been an Italian peasant and never really tried to learn English, he went to college on the advice of his sister since his high-school certainly did not have college counseling and his parents were uncertain on the procedure. Interested in how language worked, given the effort he seemed to have to make to have his father understand anything he said, but then considering himself a failed writer, he wound-up in an art history program at UC Berkeley. Someone in the graduate program asked him why he wanted to write about art when he could make art. Not coming from a world where that made any sense, he was surprised enough by the notion to consider it. And had to face the fact that what he did better than anything else was make art. As long as he thought of the job as Artist, it seemed impossible, but if he lowered the case to the simple task of being an artist then he could consider it a job. After all a plumber is just a plumber, he explained, and the important thing is to do the job. Either you are good at your job or not.

How good he was at his job was not apparent to the world immediately. For many years he had to teach to earn a living, and after pausing briefly, continued to say that anything he says about teaching has to be understood in the context that he always did it for the money–just as he had worked at a building supply company, or built houses, or produced technical illustrations. But in the end teaching seemed the most fun because he never knew what would happen that day. Tutten interrupted at this point to share his own story of being halfway through his PhD, looking down the hard road of writing his dissertation, and asking Susan Sontag if he should really keep going. Sontag replied there were three reasons to keep teaching: June, July, and August. He finished the degree and Baldessari jumped in to say that the summers allowed him to produce work with the security of some pay when otherwise there was none.

Along the way Dr. Seuss, known to him as his friend Theodore Geisel, asked Baldessari to help him start an art program for kids. Knowing nothing about children, he decided to read up on educational psychology but then wondered at its accuracy. So he figured he would find out. Told that children do not succeed at small, articulate activities, he brought in a bag of confetti and asked them to draw their hands and arms on the small colorful pieces of paper, which they did without great anxiety. Told they could not sustain endurance activities, he brought in a roll of adding paper and let the kids they could rip off as long a piece as they chose with the warning that they would have to cover the entire piece. One young boy pulled, and pulled, and pulled a piece that must have been several yards long. He drew, and drew through the morning, and after lunch drew, and drew some more, until towards the late afternoon starting to flag, he started writing, concluding with "ending now thanks to the pencil..."

People like to discuss the humor in Baldessari's work but he certainly does not, saying "if I thought I was funny, I'd be a flop". There is indeed an attitude that if you look at your own work too closely, you will lose the element that is happening without you and Baldessari seems to fall into that group. Having to look at student portfolios during his years as a teacher, he noted that those students who could talk at great length about their own work, whose speeches suggested they knew enough already, inevitably presented work that fell completely flat, failing in their flailing. The lack of uncertainty is helpful to the work. Cervantes for example, leaves him wondering if he was kidding or not.

But it does not matter what you read to become "richer, more complex" as Tutten asked him yet again for suggestions. Read fortunes and fortune cookies, he replied. Everything is important. There isn't a hierarchy of information; it is all information you can use. If you want to write, write; if you want to make art, do it. An artist needs something to trigger the mind, to confuse. Tutten trying to put a positive spin on it suggested, "to make things more interesting." Baldessari rejecting the positive spin, said again, "The job of the artist is to confuse."

On which point, he successfully bewildered Tutten, and hopefully a great many in the audience too, whose questions he then equally successfully evaded.

Typical

Once socialist realism was established, the Central Committee encouraged foreign visitors. In the twenties, Soviet Russia had used foreign correspondents to spread the anti-capitalist, anti-bourgeois ideology, but now these visits allowed the authors to understand and write according to party guidelines.

Stalin molded reality. Socialist realism was to reflect his vision, because it did not depict what is, but rather what ought to be. And not just any "what ought to be" but specifically the "ought to be" envisioned by Stalin. He was the creative force, greater than any artist in front of an easel. The writer was accorded the possibility of participating in his creative vision.

The typical was not that which was encountered everywhere, bur rather that which most persuasively indicated a social force, manifested the party spirit. Stalin had said that what was most important to the dialectical method was not that which is stable and beginning therefore to die, but that which is emerging and developing. The typical would therefore present emerging party objectives. And where else could those objectives originate but Stalin. Writers were thus invited to spend time with him in order to 'divine' the party orientation.

This also explains why favorites could suddenly be cast aside when he changed his mind and thus no longer agreed with the vision they had presented earlier when it did seem to agree with his. Artists could not create outside the purview of his vision since he was the creative force and they simply depicted the reality he proclaimed. Therein lies the realism of socialist realism.

The typical allowed foreign visitors to write according to party guidelines and thus assist the revolution. Deviance was considered a denial of the Party credo. The typical was an important political and aesthetic concern since properly depicting it was an absolute indicator of belief, and often a matter of life or death for the Russian artists.

Gorky's Chicken

A fact is still not the whole truth; it is merely the raw material from which the real truth of art must be smelted and ex­tracted—the chicken must not be roasted with its feathers. This, however, is precisely what reverence for the fact results in—the accidental and inessential is mixed with the essential and typical. We must learn to pluck the fact of its inessential plumage; we must be able to extract meaning from the fact.

So spake Gorky as he explained how socialist realism did not merely depict reality but was to present the reality made present by the success of the Revolution, which was only invisible to those who were still lost in bourgeois illusions and confusions. There is so much more to say about this but the metaphor here is really all that counts.

Soviet Russia as a plucked chicken.

Thank you, Gorky.

Barnes Foundation

The Barnes Foundation closes its Merion doors in June 2011, reopening in Philadelphia in 2012. Go now.
Albert Barnes
Giorgio de Chirico,
Portrait of Dr. Albert C. Barnes
                   1926

The Barnes Foundation was established by Albert C. Barnes in 1922 to "promote the advancement of education and the appreciation of the fine arts."

The Barnes website explains: Born in a working class Philadelphia neighborhood in 1872, Barnes received a B.S. degree from Central High School in Philadelphia and, at the age of twenty, his M.D. from the University of Pennsylvania Medical School. He also studied chemistry and pharmacology at the University of Berlin, and at the Ruprecht-Karls-Univerität in Heidelberg, where he befriended German scientist Herman Hille, with whom he invented the antiseptic silver compound, Argyrol, and formed the firm of Barnes & Hille in 1902. By 1908, he bought out his partner.

Barnes's was a great reader in the fields of psychology, philosophy and art - favorites including John Dewey, George Santayana, and William James. He formed theories of his own on art and education, implementing seminars in his factories for the workers. He attended John Dewey's seminars at Columbia University on the scientific method in education, from which a friendship and collaboration grew. The Barnes Foundation was founded in 1922 in order to provide an education in art through the presentation of art. As the website says:
A new force had entered the art world: a self-made man with substantial financial and intellectual resources, combative intensity, relentless curiosity, a keen eye for art, and a deeply-rooted respect for the common man.
Barnes collected an impressive selection of art: more than 150 Renoirs, 40 Soutines, 60 Cezannes; Matisse produced a mural specifically for the entry; and so much more. The building was designed specifically to house the works.

When he died, he left the Foundation to Lincoln University, a college for African-Americans, with the stipulation that none of the work must ever be sold or rearranged. There is an interesting documentary, The Art of the Steal, that gives an account for how and why the collection developed the monetary issues that it did, which have led to its relocation to Philadelphia. It is a wonderfully gossipy story of art world insiders.

The collection was carefully planned and designed for its current location, and I can only encourage everyone to attend while it is still in its out-of-the-way Merion, PA location as despite promises, there is some uncertainty as to how the work will be presented in its new location.






Les Chants de Maldoror

Isidore Ducasse, better known in the literary world under the pseudonym Comte de Lautreamont, published in 1869 a strange book in six parts entitled, Les Chants de Maldoror. He became known as the forefather of surrealism after Philippe Soupault and André Breton had his work republished, impassioned by the work.

The surrealists, in general, embraced him. Magritte and Dali both produced illustrated text. Besides his cover for the work, I have included one of Magritte's illustrations that is reminiscent of a scene in the second song in which the narrator explains he was deaf until one day looking up at the sky, and then looking even higher, he saw a throne made of human excrement and gold on which sat a proud body, covered in a dirty hospital shroud, called The Creator, who held in his hand the trunk of a body which he brought to his eyes, then nose, then mouth. At which point you can well imagine that he did devour the flesh. His feet dipped in a boiling sea of blood from which humans bobbed up for air before sinking immediately. One body digested, he would plunge his hand around the neck of another and eating the head first, then the legs and arms, occasionally cry out: "I created you; thus do I have the right to do with you what I want. You have done nothing to me, I do not suggest to the contrary. I make you suffer, and that for my pleasure". In response to this sight, the young deaf boy lets out a piercing scream, the first sound he ever hears.

The book is known for its depiction of cruelty and evil. There are some scenes that are truly horrendous, à la Sade but without the fixation on sex, with the ability to be cruel across the terrain of the mind and flesh. These moments are so well described, some characters seem so easy to envision, that it is not terribly surprising that artists would want to sketch out their own images for these bizarre 'songs'.

Dali's imagination easily transferred. In 1933, Albert Skira who had already published Ovid's Metamorphoses illustrated by Picasso and some poems of Mallarmé illustrated by Matisse, requested that Dali provide engravings for this text that was so important to the surrealists. Dali had been recommended by Picasso, who was then producing the cover for the first issue of the surrealist journal Minotaure, being published by Skira. Though Dali was involved in the journal from its first issue, he would only produce a cover for the eighth issue, which was financed by the Englishman Edward James whose patronage supported the Dalis in 1936. Magritte, also occasionally supported by James, would produce 77 illustrations for a 1948 edition of the text published in Belgium.

Though Les Chants are boringly dark (as anyone who has read Sade will understand), they have moments for anyone of interest. The surrealists were particularly taken with it because the author was such a mystery, little known of him and dying suddenly, buried quickly and then moved to another location. Though Ducasse published this text anonymously and at his own cost, he began writing a second book, of which we only have the first two sections Poems I and Poems II, which was to:
replace melancoly with courage, doubt with certainty, desperation with hope, complaints with responsibility, skepticism with faith, sophistry with cold calm, and pride with modesty. 

Cherry Blossoms

I know it is Spring when I see cherry blossoms. I was travelling to Vancouver when I saw the first ones and took a picture to savour. I arrived back in New York City and a tree outside a church was in full bloom. So was another tree and thus, despite the tremendous quantities of rain, I am happy that it is Spring! Their brief bloom makes them all the more special, with the reminder that Spring in New York is a very short season that launches us quickly into summer.
Growing up, I enjoyed the cherry blossom festival in Washington DC but have not been in years. The cherry blossom tree is the national tree of Japan. The festival was nearly a month ago this year, and I missed again the celebration commemorating the gift of 3000 cherry trees from the Mayor of Tokyo to Washington DC in 1912. They were planted around the Tidal Basin where they flower and shower pink petals through the breeze, a veritable wonderland. In return, in 1915 a gift of dogwood trees was shipped to Tokyo. In 1965, Lady Bird Johnson received 3800 more trees. After a major flood in 1981, cuttings from these trees were sent to horticulturists in order to replace the loss. Now the festival lasts two weeks, with daily activities for school children, tourists and random general interest. A few years ago the Smithsonian produced an album of music, featuring traditional Japanese music, classical instruments and choral ensembles.
Hokusai, Mount Fuji seen through cherry blossoms
Cherry trees are also a popular tattoo. Though I have no desire to be tattooed, I do see the beauty in many of the designs. I found the image below of a torso tattoo, which I share here because not only is the tattoo well done but the photo-collage illuminates the tattoo so well.

Cultural Soft Power

As American museums struggle to maintain an audience, how interesting that China is now projecting a museum boom. The US Government shrank cultural budgets internationally and dismantled USIA after the fall of the Eastern Bloc, believing there was no need to exert cultural influence any longer (and this before YouTube and Facebook!). Within several years of this decision, having succeeded in competing economically, China decided to make an effort for cultural influence as well.

The Chinese government is backing these efforts with, for example, $4.45 billion in 2009–not including construction costs. One hundred museums are being added each year. I wonder what exactly about or showing. Most historic museums are free, but as of March the government decided that all museums of contemporary and modern art would be free. The new National Museum opened this month with a floor area quoted by a Chinese official as being "a little bit bigger than the Met" at 2.07 million square feet on Beijing's Tiananmen Square.

attributed to Johann Heinrich Lips
The leading show is "The Art of the Enlightenment", on view for a year, and a massive diplomatic feat between Germany and China. Collaborating with Germany on this show is an extension of the cultural exchanges that have taken place since 2005 in an effort to foster mutual understanding- a typical phrase of diplomacy the meaning of which is left to be deciphered in whatever context it is raised. The museums of Munich, Dresden, and Berlin have lent 579 artworks, scientific instruments and costumes.

A portrait of Voltaire holding a lantern, shining a light outward beyond the picture frame, concludes the show. Intentionally so as "It tells everything" said a curator of the museum, Chen Yu to Andras Szanto of the Art Newspaper (from which all this information has been gathered).

Soft power, defined by Harvard professor Joseph Bye, is "the ability to get what you want through attraction rather than coercion or payment", a concept that Stalin's soviet communism certainly never mastered. In 2007 at the the 17th Party Congress, president Ju Jintao said, "we must enhance culture as a part of the soft power of our country" as this would allow the spread of Chinese influence abroad. Seems soviet China gets the idea quite clearly.

Most western countries have reduced cultural budgets with the expectation that private foundations would provide the support instead, so that we have a libertarian policy towards the arts and a deeply socialist policy towards our banking system–but besides making such a flagrant remark I will not discuss this now. The problem with this idea is that private foundations are uncomfortable, and reasonably so, with supporting international programs. Private grant foundations operate generally on a local, or specific interest basis. The issues of the nation are not a relevant concern to private funds. If we live in a global economy and international culture, a reduction in art exchange is undeniably the beginning of a fall from significance, and thus eventually power.

Let's face it. The current attitude towards the arts and humanities is a disgrace to the very notion of 'civilization' that the US is so proud to tout. Working in public schools, be they elementary or the college level, makes it too obvious how embarrassingly uneducated we have permitted ourselves to become. We treat the arts as an unnecessary, even irrelevant, part of the world because we have allowed ourselves to believe that we 'gain' nothing from it. It is interesting to note in this context how often prisoners not only produce exchange systems for food, cigarettes, or not getting screwed, but also pictures and poetry. Because whether in the concentration camps of the Holocaust or the prisons of Guantanamo, what keeps those bodies human under duress is the beauty in their pained creative acts.

The art that is produced in this country, though I may disparage much of it, is a part of the vision of this great nation. To let it waste away will be to encourage the transfer of that knowledge to other places. I, for one, am considering moving to the Middle East. The children of the West, in the arts, humanities and sciences, were raised capitalist and will follow the money. The potential cost to the nation? Irrelevant.

Michelangelo's letters

Debra Parker recently published a book, Michelangelo and His Letters. Though the title might suggest that it is for students of literature or history, it is actually intended for art historians.

Her study is intentionally cross-disciplinary, with each chapter offering an understanding of Michelangelo that could then be applied to his art. Michelangelo letters contain info about his life, business affairs, family trials, problems of his projects, materials; they provide information about his work, contractual obligations, relationships with patrons, friends, etc. As such they have largely been used to reveal the historical Michelangelo which privileges the realism of the letters as an archive rather than their literary source as an exploration of his artistic sense. He was a consummate artist and a skilled rhetorician, "wielded his pen boldly" in his poems and the letters as well, and yet they have never been studied for their literary quality.

Biographers bring different vested interests to their own projects and as such letters are usually read in that light. Vasari, for example, aggrandizes his relationship, even altering the letters to underscore his closeness to Michelangelo. Condivi, who had been Michelangelo's friend, tried to correct Vasari and dispel rumours of Michelangelo's arrogance and worse. In the 19th cnetury, Aurelio Gotti tried to redce the semblance of any anger in his letters by focusing the story of his biography on pleasant family matters. More letters came to light and were slowly incorporated although Michelangelo's heirs did not want the letters to be widely available. 

Each chapter has a focus on an aspect of his letters that art historians can use for their own research. Chapter 2 focuses on his use of aphorism, repetitions, oppositions, comparatives, intentional. The intensification of his language is, apparently, analog to the expressive use of gesture in his visual art. Though much has been made of the topic of enslavement in his poetry, Parker examines his regular discussion of such feelings in his letters as well, how he is enslaved by project, using words such as bondage, captivity-though I must say this sounds like any artist working on commission.

She concludes having demonstrated that he truly excelled at communicating what he wished to communicate. To take Michelangelo at his words is problematic because it provides a simplistic reading of a complicated man. He was not just angry, or arrogant, or desperate. Reading the letters purely for their narrative assumes a desire to provide a single unit man at the end. Looking at his language, however, does not privilege one characteristic or style of discourse. Looking at a cluster of words and their affiliate connotations keeps this from happening, by offering multiple ways of meaning, deeper patterns. It offers a model of reading, a cautious approach to his letters, that is common among literary scholars but may not be so in art history.

This is what interdisciplinary work provides ideally, that is the tools of one field in a manner that can be incorporated in another field with discrimination. It reveals a potential tie to both worlds rather than overwhelming one or subduing another. Whether the book proves useful to art historians, only time will tell but I can certainly hope that her respectful effort is considered by any who are embracing cross-disciplinary work.

The Tax Collector

It seems appropriate today to think about taxes, though if you already filed you might wish not to be reminded, for which I then apologize. Earlier this week I was reading about Caravaggio whose The Calling of St. Matthew is in the Contarelli Chapel, Church of San Luigi dei Francesi, Rome which seems appropriate to address now.
The Bible says, in Matthew 9:9, that Levi, counting his money, once summoned by Saint Peter and Christ immediately left his life of finance to be a disciple and the apostle, Saint Matthew: Jesus saw a man named Matthew at his seat in the custom house, and said to him, "Follow me", and Matthew rose and followed him. Now just about the last thing any of us need is someone from the IRS believing they are on a mission from God, or to God, so let's forget about how I got to this painting today and laugh that I argued with someone this week about that wrist, limply pointing a finger at Levi, who responds with a surprised pointing at himself.

For someone who has not studied the Sistine Chapel in depth, that hand is reminiscent of the Michelangelo's Sistine Chapel ceiling gesturing between God and Adam. I have included a close up of both here because after looking more closely I have decided that indeed Adam's hand does resemble Christ's. 

The painting may not be Caravaggio's strongest (so 'they' say) although the split second of stillness amid the money counting, Christ's entrance, St. Matthew's calling seems perfectly executed to me. Another work by Caravaggio, The Fortune Teller, will be at the Italian Cultural Institute from May 11- 13th where hand gestures continue to play a vital role in the action, in which today's fortune would have been exchanged for a future fortune, but the young man looks as convinced as I would be.

The Dream, Rousseau and Plath

Ekphrastic poems break or challenges the painting sequence because they are not descriptions of the poem, but their own creations based in some way from the picture. Most famously Ode to  Grecian Urn, but so many others as well. Anne Carson with her recent Decreation. Sharon Dolin as well with Serious Pink (with "Sad Flowers" by Howard Hodgkin as the cover art which I do not like). But I am particularly intrigued by Sylvia Plath's response to Rousseau's The Dream.


The Dream mystified critics when it was shown at the Salon des Indépendants in 1910. For Rousseau's young admirers, this work was perhaps the pinnacle of his achievement. When it was unveiled, the poet and critic Apollinaire wrote: "The picture radiates beauty, that is indisputable. I believe nobody will laugh this year". He had been mocked in the past for his strange topics and style


The painter included a poem as the inscription to the piece.
Yadwigha, falling into sweet sleep,
heard in a lovely dream
the sounds of a musette
played by a kind enchanter.
While the moon shone
on the flowers, the verdant trees,
the wild snakes lent an ear
to the instrument's gay airs.

Critics could not understand why the naked woman should be reclining on a velvet sofa in the middle of the jungle. One critic suggested that it was because the color red needed to be there. For Rousseau, the answer was obvious. As he explained in a letter to a critic: "The woman sleeping on this sofa dreams that she is transported into the middle of the forest, hearing the charmer's pipe". But it also seems as if they are disturbed not by the naked woman, but wanted to know why the couch should be in the jungle, which Sylvia Plath slyly begins to address in the opening lines of her poem, Yadwigha, on a Red Couch, Among Lillies
Yadwigha, the literalists once wondered how you
Came to be lying on this baroque couch
Upholstered in red velvet, under the eye
Of uncaged tigers and a tropical moon,
Set in intricate wilderness of green
Heart-shaped leaves, like catalpa leaves, and lilies 
Of monstrous size, like no well-bred lilies
It seems the consistent critics wanted you
To choose between your world of jungle green
And the fashionable monde of the red couch
Plath addresses the critics, "But the couch/Stood stubborn in it's jungle: red against green,/Red against fifty variants of green,/The couch glared out at the prosaic eye." She almost apologizes for Rousseau: "Rousseau, to explain why the red couch/Persisted in the picture with the lilies,/Tigers, snakes, and the snakecharmer and you,/And birds of paradise, and the round moon,/Described how you fell dreaming at full of moon/On a red velvet couch within your green-/Tessellared boudoir."

She concludes: "But to a friend, in private, Rousseau confessed his eye/So possessed by the glowing red of the couch which you,/Yadwigha, pose on, that he put you on the couch/To feed his eye with red, such red! under the moon,/In the midst of all that green and those great lilies!"

Active couch, still figure. The figure becomes irrelevant as the couch grows larger and more problematic. Focusing on the couch, she mocks Rousseau, mocks the objectification of the couch, rather than the figure, but by making the figure minor, she allows her "you" to become a subject of a different kind. Plath resists the objectification of the female figure and the consequent strength of the male poetic voice, by looking at the 'pink elephant' as it were. Removal of the body as the core, displacement to the couch, allows her reader, also "you", to wonder at her use of language, much as the critics wondered at the burgundy couch.

Helene Cixous, in The Laughing Medusa, encourages women to write, to write their way, and "burst with forms much more beautiful than those in frames and sold for a stinking fortune", a point I shall not address here but only to say that Plath's poem is better than much that is sold, but in this instance does not require such antagonistic comparison. Plath complements Rousseau, it seems to me, with a similar joy and humor at their subject matter. Plath and Rousseau make nice companions here.

On the poem itself- the sestina, that highly structured six stanza sextet with a final tercet (there are some other traditional rules that Plath does not use). Lyric poetry seems to be the preferred form for ekphrastic poems, and the sestina quite often. As a last note, I will mention the subtitle that Plath gives the poem, A sestina for the douanier.  The subtitle pokes lightly at his nickname The Douanier, the tax collector, in reference to his many years at that work. He had eventually at 49 given up working to produce the art that made him happy. He died a few months after presenting The Dream at the Salon.

Moments of Art

In a little curio shop a half-spent candle, projecting its warm glow over an engraving, reprinted it in sanguine, while, battling against the darkness, the light of a big lamp bronzed a scrap of leather, inlaid a dagger with glittering spangles, spread a film of previous gold like the patina of time or the varnish of an old master on pictures which were only bad copies, made in fact of the whole hove, in which there was nothing but pinch-beck rubbish, a marvelous composition by Rembrandt. The Guermantes Way, Part 1
I was thinking of some image like the following, sadly mislabeled as a Rembrandt. As I went looking through other Rembrandts, I could not find an interior lit that was sufficiently like Proust description though I know exactly what he means, and imagining something could not find an actual Rembrandt like the one in my or Proust's mind. 
One of my favorite pastimes is walking through neighborhoods where I can look in windows as evening settles around dinner and home. A loneliness lingers, a lie I welcome–oddly comforted by the melodrama of my own lack as I walk. Some of the back streets of Brooklyn Heights offer surprising stores of window delights at night. I walked them a few times until I noticed the glimpse no longer offered a surprise as I passed by and so would have had to stop as I went, to look, thereby ruining the desired experience.

Such moments are like the panels painted centuries ago whose warmth and aged darkness bring you closer even as they keep the distance necessary for appreciation.

Sketches of Change

...Our social existence, like an artist's studio, is filled with abandoned sketches in which we fancied for a moment that we could set down in permanent form our need of a great love, but it did not occur to me that sometimes, if the sketch is not too old, it may happen that we return to it and make of it a wholly different work, and one that is possibly more important than what we had originally planned. The Guermantes Way, Part II Chapter 2

There is a scene in a Woody Allen movie, though which one I do not remember, in which a character explains that he may not do well in life but he does in art. I always though reality was over-rated and that the story is much better if you revise it slightly, sometimes for others, sometimes for yourself. There are friends who weave through my life, each time we are each altered. Joys from the past now seem juvenile. Current pursuits will dull, or maybe with practice become helpful habits.

I spent part of the past few months working on ideas that I thought were only useful to the moment and the task at hand. Recently I am beginning to see how I might allow that work to become a part of a necessary step in a project that had seemed totally separate. The papers come back out of the filing cabinet to be reshuffled on my desk and on my computer.

Sometimes the task seems more daunting than Vermeer suggests in his The Artist in his Studio of 1665. I often have to come at the work sideways, disturbed by it slightly as Rembrandt appears to be in his The Artist in His Studio, c 1629.


However it feels, life only appears fixed. I find myself in new situations only to realize they are oddly familiar, and that this time I can alter the color, dynamic, of an aspect because I know better, or simply because I am curious. Why not treat life as a picture to return to and reconsider? Why not sketch something new from the material at hand? Or, take an old thing and refine it? Whatever happens, no matter how intimidating, there is at least the exciting possibility that it will offer something more important, produced more wisely, than before.

The Importance of Being

The production currently on Broadway of Oscar Wilde's The Importance of Being Earnest has some flaws, which mostly did not keep me from laughing. The script is too good. Wilde is too wonderful.

I have a list of people whose works and efforts seem incomparable to any of my own and so work, and work, and work. How did Wilde write so much, have so much fun, so much demand and well? One of the reasons that I have been quiet is because I have a million notes on talks I have attended, works that I have seen, but have not had the time to write them up. Notes, however, must always be drafted immediately after being taken, otherwise they remain a jumble of meaningless words, undecipherable far quicker than my imagination can fathom.

Despite all that, I took today off to recover, because there are many ways of being, none of which mean a thing if being exhausted is the only state of being. And so I, like John Worthing, understand the importance of being something other than the state we dash about seeming.

Macintosh versus PC

I am typing this on my new iPad which I love, love, love. My life is simply better with it. I could go into details but that would inevitably make me sound like a Mac cult member and as I in fact am, why push it even more. Among the joys of the iPad, I will mention here only one: I have a number of art books loaded on it and the pictures could not be more beautiful.

Last summer I switched back to Mac after five years on PC. The transition was not easy. In fact, Macs were so different that I had to learn an entirely new system, as well as iWork over Microsoft Word. I had to get accustomed to double saving documents so that my Pages documents could be emailed as .doc or my Presentation could be PowerPoint. Despite these nuisances, I love the MacBook. I even convinced a friend to get one.

All designers use them because their design capabilities are unbeatable. Their speed, their graphics make working on them in Photoshop or other such programs so much more pleasant. But why would I get one if I am not doing that?

Because they are beautiful. Because even words look better on the screen and though this is not imperative to words functionality, it is a bonus if you look at a screen all day, and much of the night. In the last couple years the Macs have become much more adept at transferring documents with PCs so that the pain that PC users used to feel in having to interact with them is gone, if the Mac user is Mac savvy.

If a picture is worth a thousand words, all the words are worth the cost.

Gallery Manifesto

You can imagine the thrill when only hours after finishing my talk on manifestos, I should be walking into the Vancouver Gallery of Art, into the Emily Carr gallery completely taken over by a show entitled We: Vancouver 12 Manifestos for the City. They commissioned several manifestos, which are available online, but the show is focused around twelve verbs, themselves identified as manifestos, for example:
SEE: We perceive. We experience. We witness. We survey and scrutinize.
DETOUR: We divert. We drift or swerve. We change direction. We take the long way around.
The show is massive and wildly entertaining. Multimedia is certainly its medium. The show takes manifestos in their performative quality and presents examples or illustrations of the 'event' that occurred, or would occur, in the city. It includes: recommending that an old, large tree be 'placed' in every roundabout, a video and a mixed audio sample of a June day in 2010 when a group of citizens went out into the city and made music by tapping with sticks and hands on the physical body of the city (trashcans, grates, lamp-posts, etc), the development of an aboriginal restaurant with a high flair, several environmentally conscious construction projects, a selection of books that six separate people offered as their definition of Vancouver, the clothing of the woman who decided to make anything she would wear for one year (from shoes to underwear to hairbands), the street art of Cameraman–among other things known for producing a Louis Vuitton dumpster in 2008–who was allowed to produce optical tricks all over the museum for the duration of the show, a reminder of the June 1976 world gathering Habitat: United Nations Conference on Human Settlements on the global problem of homelessness (a major issue in Vancouver), and more. It was overwhelming, indeed "overdose and overdrive" as Caws says a manifesto ought to be.

Is the show itself a manifesto? Well, yes. It is a collage work wherein each piece would fall apart without the vibrance of the manifesto concept that unites them. There are elements that are more interesting to me, and presumably to you, than others. But it certainly makes its point, that Vancouver isn't just a place surrounded by trees, water and sky. That it is also a city, one that has a lot to say and should not shy away from it, is a point made and made again. At the end of the show was a large piece of paper with one design of the show lightly on it to take home, to write on, to draw/write the word you want said, to keep, to give, but at any rate to manifest for yourself.

There was a lot else, but that at any rate blew my mind because you'd have to be dead not to get excited about manifestos.