Let's Talk Around since not About

In a discussion with Kenneth Koch, John Ashberry said: It's rather hard to be a good artist and also be able to explain intelligently what your art is about. In fact, the worse your art is the easier it is to talk about it.

I can certainly agree that discussing what one's own art is about might be difficult, but I think we ought to be careful not to misread this statement as suggesting that one ought not to be able to discuss one's art. This is extremely difficult, and makes many uncomfortable, but an artist ought to be able to help guide people to elements by which they can begin a relationship with the work.

Why not just let people see it and appreciate it (or not) for themselves?

Well, that certainly would be nice. Unfortunately, especially today, we live in a world where we expect to be assisted. That has, even more unfortunately, created an environment in which people do not believe we can understand art and demand someone to tell us about it. Anyone can, and there are gallerists and curators who will, but why not let the artist at least provide some introductory remarks on which to help the viewer set sail–note that I did not suggest the artist talk about the art itself, so much as talk around it, talk about interesting things to consider alongside it, talk about anything that might allow someone who is afraid of art to begin to consider it alone.

So long as we continue to propagate the myth that artists are unintelligent and unintelligible beings of another realm, we will continue to have an audience for art that believes it must learn a foreign language in order to understand what it sees. Artists are trained to produce image-based productions (whether of a lasting or momentary-performative variety) and can equally be encouraged (or even taught) to speak for themselves. John Ashberry was an eloquent art critic who attended to art with care and compassion (even if he claimed in an interview in the Paris Review never to have been interested in producing art criticism but fell into it to make money). He has, however and even, been notably inspired by art, as in Self-Portrait in a Convex Mirror for which he won the Pulitzer Prize as well as the National Book Award and the National Book Critics Circle Award. Thank you, Parmigianino!
Parmigianino, Self Portrait at the Mirror, c 1524
Not speaking about a work of art may even be important for the work of art to stand on its own, and develop its own life, apart from the artist. As Oscar Wilde said, a work of art "may be marred, and indeed often is so, by an excess of intellectual intention on the part of the artist. For when the work is finished it has, as it were, an independent life of its own, and may deliver a message far other than that whcih was put into its lips to say." If the artist knows the meaning of the work of art, and can state it, that meaning may limit how the work can impact. But not speaking about the intention of the work does not negate talking about art, albeit indirectly, because in fact, it is that very indirection that begins to open up for the common viewer the great realm of art, and learn to step sideways out of the dominating elements of the immediate to see something from a different, perhaps convex, point of view.

Appena Possibile

As soon as possible...
As soon as possible...

"Your pictures would have been finished a long time ago if I were not forced every day to do something to earn money," said Edgar Degas in a letter to the art collector Jean-Baptiste Faure in 1877.  But that does not even consider the number of pictures he was telling himself he would get to

As soon as possible...
As soon as possible...

There are so many demands we all face of the most basic element: rent, food, bills, relationships, letter writing...emails. How much time do we spend trying to respond to emails when we know we could be getting other things done? Flaubert, Kafka, Tolstoy, Barthes, all of them complained that they would have written more if it were not for the incessant demands of writing letters about this, that, and of course the work they aren't doing because they are writing letters and will start working again...

As soon as possible...
As soon as possible...

I am currently learning to translate Italian so that I can take an exam as soon as possible. Why? So that I can submit for other requirements as soon as possible. Why? So that I can be on the job market as soon as possible. Why? So that I can get on with my life as soon as possible.

But wait.

This is my life.

How much can actually be done as soon as possible without sacrificing quality? What would Flaubert have said to someone who told him that he needed to write Madame Bovary as soon as possible because there were deadlines and that style was worth sacrificing to the great god of As Soon As Possible? In Balzac's tale Le Chef D'Oeuvre Inconnu, the artist has spent years painting his greatest work of art, which is dismissed at a moment's glance by some visitors, to which he responds by committing suicide. A dramatic response, but one that anyone can recognize who has been deeply disheartened by a quick dismissive summarizing of hard work. What would, actually what did, Michelangelo say to his many patrons, including Popes, who wanted him to hurry? He got angry, disgruntled, and didn't give an inch. It takes time to reveal the statue from within the stone.

There are plenty of things that must be done in a hurry, but neither art nor appreciation (true criticism) can be done quickly. You can not dash through an art gallery if you hope to actually consider the art work. You will see it and that is undoubtedly a fine thing, but you can hardly expect to have appreciated it. You can not read a book in a blur and recognize its finer qualities, though you can certainly claim to have read it–by a limited definition of the word read. There are things to be done as soon as possible, but I think I might here posit that Art, and Literature and Music, are what we have to remind us of that which is not...

As soon as possible.

You get to know a painting over years of living with it and seeing it under different lights, life experiences, emotions...You get to know a text of literature from spending time reading it and revisiting it. In a world that is always happening, always ready to do the next thing, the arts might be all that we have left to remind us that this is it. We can appreciate it now, or we can keep saying

As soon as possible...
As soon as possible...

Until the day when that can't be said at all.

Pascal Thoughts

Blaise Pascal's Pensées are currently on my mind and one seemed particularly appropriate to a recent situation. Last Friday, I picked up a picture of my mother's that she had always hung in her standard height, ten foot tall, apartments here in New York City. As it was a life size portrait, it rather dominated the room. I remember it therefore as being large, looming, impossible to ignore. It was leaning against the garage door when I arrived and in comparison seemed small. Once hung in the loft studio to which it was taken it seemed even smaller next to the careful canvases of the painter whose studio it is.
French School, Portrait of Blaise Pascal, at Versailles (and also adorning my Penguin Classics edition)
Pascal is discussing the delicate point in time at which one can edit well, too close and one has no view of the matter, too far and one can not pick up the gist of it, when he says: "It is like looking at pictures which are too near or too far away. There is just one indivisible point which is the right place." (#21) Good grief can you imagine the museum jostling if that were true? But he goes on, "Others are too near, too far, too high, or too low. In painting the rules of perspective decide it, but how will it be decided when it comes to truth and morality?" Oh my, "decide it". Decide what? And do the rules of perspective truly indicate only one acceptable point at which to view a picture? What is this right place? I get papers with such reasoning from my students occasionally and would forgive them if they would reference Pascal as their stylistic ancestor, but they don't and I am not overly convinced by Pascal just on his own merit either. I am trying though.

Later (#41) he says "Two infinities, mean. When we read too fast or too slowly we understand nothing." Convenient excuse, if I ever saw one, for putting the blame on the reader who might be bewildered by his analogy between the well made heel of a shoe or the courage of a soldier and one's chosen career. (#35)

I have visions of a man wearing fancy heels, holding a rifle in a 17th century picture gallery declaiming sceptically. It certainly makes reading Pascal more fun.


**All quotes taken from the Penguin edition with translations by A.J. Krailsheimer

Wooster and Montesquieu

Bertram Wilberforce "Bertie" Wooster is a defining character of P.G. Wodehouse's career, and my cat. Now my cat came to me at a somewhat later age through a complicated channel that I will not bore you with here as it is far more amusing to bore you with it in person. I was reading a great deal of Wodehouse when he arrived in my life and his deep concern for food and the most comfortable spot in any comfortable area reminded me of Bertie's own proclivity for creature comforts. Though my Wooster is less capable of quoting MacBeth when in a spot of trouble, he hisses as if he were Lady M. In his little gray suit, and sharp white shirt and boots he is indeed a fine dandy.

Which is why a dear friend yesterday informed me that unpacking her Penguin copy of Huysman's Against the Grain (A Rebours), she was struck by the similarity between the cover image and my cat. What an honor! Upon finding the cover in a quick Google search, I discovered that the portrait is one of my own favorite artists Boldini!

Now the original work represents the Comte de Montesquieu, the aesthete of the aesthetes. He represents much of the art for art sake's movement, his appetite for life, fine things, and beauty in general making him a prominent promoter and benefactor of the aesthetic and decadent movements at the end of the 19th century. A prolific art critic, an occasional poet (a seeming requirement of the times), he was a portrait sitter extraordinaire. Besides Boldini, he sat for Whistler, de Laszlo, Paul Helleu, and though a supporter of Sargent's, peculiarly never sat for him. 

He is one of the models for Proust's character Baron de Charlus in In Search of Lost Time. Some of the moments of greatest arrogance which lead to acts of cruel spitefulness are loosely based on Montesquieu's own behavior. He was quite hurt by Proust's interpretation of him–after all he had introduced Proust to Society–but must have understood the note of truth if he was able to recognize himself.

Montesquieu was friends with Mallarmé, Sarah Berhnhardt, Paul Verlaine, as well as socialites of the period beyond count, where my Wooster is really more a stay-at-home recluse who seems happy with my company alone. The Comte de Montesquieu would no doubt be horrified that I never do my nails or personally know Anna Wintour. Though my Wooster does not get into any of the scrapes from which Jeeves rescued the fictional Wooster, I do feel that I awake to serve him breakfast and am reprimanded if supper is tardy.

As TS Eliot explained better than I can, the naming of cats is a difficult matter and to get it correct is not done. But a name that's suggestive, that allures, is the best of the options to come. So I point laughing to a foolish Etonian, and another finds him in a grander salon-ian. But these human names are false. Seeing him calm and reflective I wish we all had what Montesquieu appears to have in Boldini's portrait, what Wooster would lose without Jeeves, what a cat seems to have with ease:
His mind is engaged in a rapt contemplation
Of the thought, of the thought, of the thought of his name:
His ineffable effable
Effanineffable.
Deep and inscrutable singular Name.

Strange Pictures on the Street

Most of my life is spent inside a book, preparing to discuss it or write about it. But the rest is lived in Bushwick, a gentrifying neighborhood of those artists who moved into the lofts when it was still a questionable neighborhood, as well as those post-undergraduates who moved in after Roberta’s accepted credit cards and was covered by the NY Times, who debate if they are willing to dedicate their lives to a struggle that would likely deny them their underlying bourgie expectations of comfort, those places of solace that the career artists have rejected in favor of the rare pleasure they take from their photography, sculpture, theatre sets, traditional painting or street art.

I play the role of strange-but-cool to an eleven year old girl whose parents are good New York parents, keen to introduce her to art, museums, the culture of the city. The street art scene, of which I know little, but that is present both on compound walls and sold at the Factory Fresh gallery in Bushwick, requires a willing playfulness that seemed appropriate to introduce to her increasing blasé attitude towards art–a know-it-all by virtue of being a New York City kid. There is a huge wall outside the my friend's studio, which she got to visit last spring, that is always being redone. It wraps around to the other side, a continuum of 200 feet that uses its ten foot height to both good and bad effect. There are tags on other walls, on the sidewalk, hidden in corners and left prominently to view, done from the loft rooftops and also at street level. There is so much of it in this neighborhood, that many of the international visitors, prominently the Germans, staying at the Loft Hostel, can be seen in the early morning hours with their cameras, taking shots of this transient art for posterity.

There is a street I usually avoid because it leads to the recycling factory and the smell swamps and steamrolls the air into a rancid coffin for three blocks. One Saturday last summer, however, there was no smell which surprise had me wander down to enjoy a different route on the regular dog walks I take with the pitbull who is largely responsible for my knowledge of these streets. On these walks, I occasionally take snapshots with my camera phone of interesting pieces that I then show my young friend when I get together with her mother for our Diet Coke pow-wows. Though there are some brilliant and funny works that I have seen and shared, on this day it was a poster on the corner of a block that stood out, particularly because they are rarer now then they were when I was growing up in New York.

This poster did not advertise an upcoming event, or have any language on it at all. In black and white, I am surprised that I noticed it on the gray wall, but as the wall had other points of color from long forgotten tags, the organized square of printed black and white, with the top left corner peeling down drew me into the image of a street corner with three mice dressed as young gangsters from the 20th Century teens, one wearing a sharp wool suit, leaning against a lamp post, arms crossed, staring out at the street and the viewer from under his bowler, another one, well suited, resting his left arm on the lamp post to lean into the other mouse, as a third, standing away from these two, watches them in his newsboy cap and tie. Behind them, three brownstones with shops on the first floor; one of them a barber shop, the other unspecified with a rolled up striped awning. The shutters on the upstairs windows are battered, reinforcing the desperate tone of the setting. The last building is covered by a carriage being drawn by an oversized kitten, with the markings and the gray tonality that makes it seem to be an orange tabby. The cat looks straight ahead, ignores the mice, harnessed to its carriage load, focuses on each step forward.

The poster was poorly plastered onto the wall, which repeated the falling down style within the image, and provided a seemingly intentional ripple to the streets that made them look dirtier, poorly maintained, and brings me back to the street where I stand. Trash hides beneath the curb, detritus is pressed into the road from the trucks that drive through, and the general poverty of the neighborhood permits the anti-establishment life styles being cultivated until they get priced out by the next generation of SoHo, Tribecca, East Village, Williamsburg parents who disdain the established bourgeois neighborhoods in favor of establishing their own. When I show the picture to Lil Miss Blasé, she loves it and wants to come see it, disappointed that it is gone, ripped, torn, and replaced with something new that she doesn’t like as much, as disconcerted by such temporality as any art critic.

Ceiling of the NYPL

Sitting, working, studying Italian in the North room of the New York City Public Library Rose Reading room since this morning made me suddenly slouch back in my chair, lean my head against the back and stare up blankly to shake the stupor of Cellini from my mind- on that another time.

That was when I actually noticed how beautiful the ceiling is, though undoubtedly I have stared at it before. The windows on each side seem to reach the ceiling with their arches but leave room for several feet of white stone. Is it marble, I don't know but think not. I could learn more about decorative archiecture and tell you about the various patterns that line the edge of the wall and ceiling until this expanse of ornate wood panellin, decorated with gold, and deep forest green abound. There are three rectangular sections, and I am at the bottom edge of one so that looking up I see the middle section that is painted like a clear blue sky.

Today is our first day of sunshine in several days here in NYC but the ceiling is always cheerful. I would share a picture but none are allowed here, and though I could sneak one as surely many do, I like the way this room requires presence to appreciate its offerings, its books, its dulled grating of chairs on floors in the silence of computer typing, and so, also, its decoration.

On the third floor of the Schwartzman building, one does occasionally see tourists stop in to gaze. But the best way to enjoy this room is finding something to work hard on so that the books mean help when you need it, and all the sounds dissipate in the murmur of your own thoughts, and the patterned ceiling refreshed strained eyes with a different modality, and a false sky lets hope soar whether outdoors or in your soul it rains.

Too bad more places of knowledge do not provide this visual setting because it is inspirational, which is why, having shared this, I will return to my own studies...

Losing and Finding Things

I am currently going through a frenzy of cleaning and sorting, which means I am finding all sorts of things...mostly things worth handing on, others to be donated and then yet others whose only place is the trash.

Things worth keeping are filled with memories, fit well, still have a purpose, are well loved, all of the above or some combination of the above. When it comes to art I keep those works that I bought, were handed to me by family, or those that were given to me in unusual circumstances. There was the Thanksgiving I volunteered at a men's shelter and one of the men complained that there was no milk. When I returned from my short jaunt to the corner store with a gallon of milk, he was slightly perplexed and gave me an ink drawing he had done of a Native American woman he sometimes saw in his dreams. She had strength and would protect me. I had to burn the edges of the laminated cardboard to bring her presence into my life. I did and she still hides in my home, a memory of strength when I have none.

In the process of all this clearing, and remembering, a friend emailed me a drawing that he had found in his own organizing process before an extended trip. The drawing is from the summer we met. He had just decided to dedicate his life and time to art, and this drawing comes from our mutual time at an art school in Santa Fe where I was posing and he working as the Studio Assistant.
Read Lockhart, random drawing of Moi
His email was mocking in tone, laughing at work from a time that was filled with personal anxiety as he launched into a new life. Now he works full time as an artist, currently in Taos, New Mexico but thinking of moving. After all his training, he had decided to go find his own way with paint, and spent several years away from his mentors, favorite paintings, and colleagues. Now he paints with greater confidence, though he might laugh also to hear me say that, as there are plenty of days where a painting still won't go what he was prepared for it to take it in the morning.

For me, it's strange to find an image of myself from a time that has little to do with my life now, though it still inflects my life in little ways. I would have been so excited to know that I would have the life I gained, but there were many jobs, lovers, apartments, and states (both of the United States and disordered states of being) between that summer and today. I had to get rid of a lot to be here now.

The process of getting rid of detritus is also a way of finding who you are now. Some of my favorite clothes are brightly colored. I don't need lots of books I like; I'd rather donate a mystery library to a friend then hoard them on the shelf. I am more even keel now than I was in the days that this picture was drawn. I smile more. I cook even less often. But for all the things that I am not, there are all the things I am. And from all the things I get rid of, there are all the things I hold most dear. Most dearly are friendships, like the one that so unexpectedly occurred over a pose in a class we both enjoyed leaving behind.